What is legalese and should you use it in an affidavit?

Lawyers are often accused of many things, but amongst the worst might be speaking in “legalese”.

This sounds odd because you might naturally think that a lawyer should speak in something called legalese. But the phrase is never meant as a compliment.

A definition of legalese

AD: Need to transfer money or property owed by you to another person? Click here to use this form to easily transfer your property.

To understand why legalese is a bad thing, it is helpful to start with a working definition of legalese. There are lots of dictionary meanings for legalese but the one I have come up with is:

Legalese (n): language used in legal documents that is unnecessarily difficult to understand or verbose.

This is a broad definition of legalese. It doesn’t say that the defining characteristic of legalese is that it is difficult for ordinary people to understand (ie non legally-trained people).

This is because trouble with any deviation from plain language is that it is more difficult than necessary for everyone to understand – and that includes lawyers!

Lawyers and judges have been fierce critics of legalese for many years.

A famous example can be found in LaMore v. Ives, 977 F.2d 713, 716 (1st Cir.1992), where the judge memorably described a Medicaid statutory provision (42 U.S.C. ยง 1396a(a)(17)) as “a virtually impenetrable thicket of legalese and gobbledygook“.

Examples of legalese

Some classic examples of legalese which should be avoided in affidavit are:

  • using Latin words instead of English
  • using old fashioned or complicated words where simple ones would do
  • using long, complicated sentences with multiple subclauses, lists or exceptions
  • using legal (or quasi-legal) language where it is not necessary to do so

As you might have gathered by now, the best practice is to avoid any legalese in an affidavit.

Affidavits should be clear, as short as possible (meaning they have no irrelevant facts included) and use the words of the deponent. If you stick to those rules then you will never use legalese in an affidavit.

Popular posts

How does a Jewish person swear an oath? Or should Jewish people affirm affidavits instead?

Judaism is one of the most ancient and well known religions on earth. When it comes to making an affidavit, ...

What is a sham affidavit and how does the sham affidavit rule work?

A "sham affidavit" is an affidavit sworn or affirmed in an attempt to defeat a motion for summary judgment even ...

What is legalese and should you use it in an affidavit?

Lawyers are often accused of many things, but amongst the worst might be speaking in "legalese". This sounds odd because ...

Is “Further Affiant Sayeth Naught” necessary in an affidavit?

When drafting affidavits, some lawyers still add the phrase "Further Affiant Sayeth Naught" at the end of the text of ...

What does “subscribed and sworn to before me” mean?

The phrase "subscribed and sworn to before me" when used in affidavits really just means that the affidavit was signed ...

What is the difference between an affiant and a deponent in an affidavit?

The terms "affiant" and "deponent" are often used in relation to an affidavit. In fact, every affidavit must have either ...

What does it mean to verily believe something in an affidavit?

The phrase "I verily believe" or "I am informed and verily believe" is often seen in affidavits. In fact, lawyers ...

What is the meaning of “crave leave to refer” in an affidavit?

The phrase "I crave leave to refer" to a document is sometimes still found in affidavits. But what does it ...

What is a jurat in an affidavit?

The jurat in an affidavit is the signature panel at the bottom of the text of the affidavit. A jurat ...

Can you backdate or postdate an affidavit?

Backdating and postdating affidavits are different concepts but they give rise to the same problem. To backdate an affidavit means ...

Scottish oath

The Scottish oath or "oath in the Scot's Form" is a distinctive form of oath traditionally used in courts in ...