How to complete a Supreme Court of Western Australia affidavit form

This page explains how to complete an affidavit form for use in the Supreme Court of Western Australia in compliance with the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) (RSC) and the Consolidated Practice Directions (the CPD).

Before you begin, you may wish to download an affidavit form for the Supreme Court of Western Australia.

Headings

The names of the parties and case number should be filled out in the headings in the places indicated. If the affidavit is filed in a defamation act, the Commercial and Managed Cases List (CMC List) or in the Court of Appeal, additional identifying information must be included in the headings: see CPD 1.2.1.

Affidavit must be made by deponent speaking of their own knowledge

An affidavit for use in the Supreme Court of Western Australia must be confined to such facts as the deponent is able of their own knowledge to prove (r 36(6)(1) RSC).

There are exceptions for interlocutory proceedings and in certain other circumstances, although conditions apply (see r 36(6) RSC).

Text of the affidavit

The affidavit must be made in the first person (r 379(2)(1) RSC).

The opening lines of the affidavit provide for the person making the affidavit to insert their residential address and occupation. The address must be the residential address – a business address cannot be used (r 37(2)(1) RSC).

If the person making the affidavit does not have an occupation their description must be stated instead (r 37(2)(1) RSC). Some examples of the kinds of descriptions that can be used are “housewife,” “househusband,” “an unemployed person,” “retiree” etc. Vague occupations or descriptions must not be used (r 37(2)(1) RSC).

If the person making the affidavit is a party to the matter in which the affidavit is sworn, or is employed by a party, the affidavit must state so (r 37(2)(2) RSC). For example, the first numbered paragraph of the affidavit could state:

1     I am employed by the plaintiff on a part-time basis in its accounts department, three days per week.

The body of an affidavit must be divided into paragraphs numbered consecutively, each paragraph being as far as possible confined to a distinct portion of the subject (r 37(2)(3) RSC). In practise, this means that each paragraph should contain no more than 2-3 sentences.

Dates, amounts and numbers must be expressed in figures and not in words (r 37(2)(4) RSC). For example you should write “54 days” not “fifty four days.

Attachments and exhibits to affidavits for the Supreme Court of Western Australia

Documents used with an affidavit are usually called attachments because they are attached to the affidavit, with the page numbering continuing consecutively after the jurat page. However documents of an unusual size must not be attached. They must be made exhibits instead.

Detailed rules apply to the use of attachments and exhibits. These rules are set out in O 37 r 2 and r 9 of the RSC.

If the affidavit uses one or more attachments, an index which refers to the affidavit and lists each attachment, its page numbers and a short description of it, must be in the affidavit (O 37 r 2(7). The template includes such an index. The index should be deleted if attachments are not used.

Swearing or affirming the affidavit

The affidavit must be sworn or affirmed before an authorised witness in the manner required by the Oaths, Affirmations and Statutory Declarations Act 2005 (WA) (OASDA) came into operation on 1 January 2006.

If the person making the affidavit is blind or illiterate, the authorised witness for the document must certify on the affidavit that the affidavit was read aloud to the person (which must be done by the authorised witness or in their presence) and that the authorised witness is satisfied that the person understood what was read aloud (s 13 OASDA).

A form of words for this certification would be to add them following the authorised witness’s description in the jurat. For example:

Before me, [insert name of authorised witness], a legal practitioner who has held a practice certificate for at least 2 years and who holds a current practice certificate. I certify that I read this affidavit aloud to [insert name of person making affidavit] and that I am satisfied that [he / she] understood what was read aloud.

Western Australia Supreme Court affidavit template

This page has a free blank affidavit template for use in the Supreme Court of Western Australia under the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA).

Please read the information on this page before downloading the form below.

Further instructions on how to complete this form can be found here.

About this WASC affidavit template

This Supreme Court of Western Australia affidavit form has been designed to help you create a good looking affidavit using a form that is easy to work with and which complies with the rules of court. The layout is easy to read in print and electronic form, and the template has its own bespoke, auto-numbering for paragraphs.

This template is in accordance with orders 37 and 39 of the  Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) (RSC) and practice direction 1.2 of the Consolidated Practice Directions (the CPD). The RSC and CPD provide additional requirements in certain circumstances.

In compliance with the CPD and RSC, this basic template has:

  • provision for the affidavit to be titled in the cause or intended cause (O 37 r 1 RSC);
  • consecutively numbered paragraphs (O 37 r 2(3) RSC);
  • consecutively numbered pages, with the numbers being in the top right hand corder (O 37 r 2(6) and O 69 r 2(1)(e) RSC);
  • provision for an index, which must be used if the affidavit has attachments (O 37 r 2(7) RSC);
  • a space of not less than 6mm between each line (O 69 r 2(1)(b) RSC);
  • a margin of not less than 40 mm on the left hand side of each sheet(O 69 r 2(1)(d)(i) RSC);
  • shown on the first sheet the heading and title of the proceeding and a short description of the document (including the name of the deponent and the purpose for which the affidavit is filed) (O69 r 2(1)(h) RSC and 1.2.1(3) CPD); and
  • the date of the document, name of the party, address and service details in a space not longer than 50mm (O69 r 2(1)(h) RSC and 1.2.1(7) CPD).

Use of this free template is subject to our terms and conditions.

Download a free Supreme Court of Western Australia affidavit form

Western Australia Supreme Court Affidavit Form

Further reading

How to complete a Supreme Court of Western Australia affidavit form

What is the difference between an affiant and a deponent in an affidavit?

The terms “affiant” and “deponent” are often used in relation to an affidavit. In fact, every affidavit must have either an affiant or a deponent.

But what do these words mean and what is the difference between them?

The words affiant and deponent actually exactly mean the same thing. They are different terms used to refer to the person making an affidavit.

The person making the affidavit is the person whose evidence is written in the affidavit and who swears the oath or makes the affirmation in respect of that affidavit.

There is no difference between a deponent and an affiant. It is just that different countries use different terminology to refer to the same thing.

The term “affiant” is used exclusively in the USA. It would be very unusual to hear an affiant referred to as a “deponent” in North America.

The reverse position is true in most other common law countries. Places such as the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand all use the term “deponent” exclusively or near-exclusively.

But in Canada, both the terms “affiant” and “deponent” are in widespread use and are sometimes used interchangeably in the same legal case!

So the truth is that there’s no difference between an affiant and a deponent, but what you call that person all depends on where you are. And if you are in Canada, it seems you can take your pick of either.

What does it mean to verily believe something in an affidavit?

The phrase “I verily believe” or “I am informed and verily believe” is often seen in affidavits. In fact, lawyers love to say they “verily believe” all kinds of things!

So what does the phrase “I verily believe” actually mean? And should you really be using it in affidavits?

The word “verily” is a Middle English word dating from about 1250. It means “truly” or “in truth.” Therefore to “verily believe” something simply means to “truly believe” something.

Should you use “verily believe” in an affidavit?

While we still use many words dating back to Middle English times, “verily” is not one of them. You might encounter it in an ancient hymn, but it is not part of everyday language – formal or informal. The word is considered archaic these days.

The information above is all you really need to determine whether to use “verily” in an affidavit. The answer is no!

Because “verily” is that it is not a word that the person making the affidavit (the affiant) would ever use themselves, it does not make any sense to include it in their evidence. This includes lawyers! Affidavits should use the words of the affiant wherever possible.

There’s another great reason for abandoning this phrase for good. That is because “verily” does not add anything to “believe”: if a person making an affidavit swears on oath that they believe something then it is implied that they truly believe it. The entire affidavit should contain only matters the person making it truly believes are correct!

What is the meaning of “crave leave to refer” in an affidavit?

The phrase “I crave leave to refer” to a document is sometimes still found in affidavits.

But what does it mean – and is it necessary?

In this expression, the words “crave leave” mean “seek permission”.

Hence the person swearing the affidavit (the affiant) is seeking permission from the court to refer to a document referenced in the affidavit.

Here the word “crave” is being used differently to how you might ordinarily use “crave”.

In modern language, “crave” means to long for something – such as a loved one’s attention or donuts! But “crave” also has a more ancient meaning of “to ask for”. You can see this in the example below.

craving leave

Should I use the words “crave leave” in an affidavit?

If you were in an English court in the 1800s, then “crave leave” might be an appropriate expression to use in an affidavit – indeed it appears multiple times in the Works of John Locke, the author of which died in 1704.

However the phrase is completely unnecessary today.

“Craving leave” is an outdated expression and it should be avoided (its use also violates the rule that the person making the affidavit should use their own words in the text of it).

Instead of “craving leave”, to refer to a document in an affidavit, the affiant should simply refer to the document by the manner in which it is incorporated (annexing, exhibiting, attaching it or otherwise as the relevant jurisdiction permits).

For example, the person making the affidavit should simply say “Annexed and marked with the letter “A” is a [name of the annexed document].”

The bottom line is to leave your cravings for the donuts.

It might not be better for you, but it will make for a better affidavit.